From 948c7ea20b1e33ee3f3aceb87fff731ddbb3bf0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Diva Canto
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:08:20 -0700
Subject: Commented T021_TestCrossToNewRegion because (1) it can fail on panda,
 and (2) it is not a meaningful representation of region crossing.

---
 OpenSim/Region/Framework/Scenes/Tests/ScenePresenceTests.cs | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'OpenSim/Region/Framework')

diff --git a/OpenSim/Region/Framework/Scenes/Tests/ScenePresenceTests.cs b/OpenSim/Region/Framework/Scenes/Tests/ScenePresenceTests.cs
index ce6f3d6..3ee6007 100644
--- a/OpenSim/Region/Framework/Scenes/Tests/ScenePresenceTests.cs
+++ b/OpenSim/Region/Framework/Scenes/Tests/ScenePresenceTests.cs
@@ -225,7 +225,14 @@ namespace OpenSim.Region.Framework.Scenes.Tests
             Assert.That(presence.AbsolutePosition, Is.EqualTo(pos), "Position is not the same one entered");
         }
 
-        [Test]
+        // I'm commenting this test because it does not represent
+        // crossings. The Thread.Sleep's in here are not meaningful mocks,
+        // and they sometimes fail in panda.
+        // We need to talk in order to develop a test
+        // that really tests region crossings. There are 3 async components,
+        // but things are synchronous among them. So there should be
+        // 3 threads in here.
+        //[Test]
         public void T021_TestCrossToNewRegion()
         {
             TestHelper.InMethod();
-- 
cgit v1.1