| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parcels from the OAR.
The region spanning parcel shouldn't exist in this situation. If it does, when the land data is loaded it is repersisted with a local ID which comes after the ones loaded via the oar, which obliterates the oar loaded one.
Resaving the data we just loaded from the database is somewhat odd in itself (though this makes sense from the way that OAR loading was already using the same event).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of merged.
The --merge switch will still merge the old and new land parcelling.
|
|
|
|
| |
joins parcels in an area, osParcelSubdivide splits parcels in an area, osParcelSetDetails sets parcel name, description, owner and group owner. Join and Subdivide methods in LandChannel are exposed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
does the real LandChannel), percolating to SceneSetupHelpers.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
LICENSE.txt.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenSim.Region.Environment into a "framework" part and a modules only
part. This first changeset refactors OpenSim.Region.Environment.Scenes,
OpenSim.Region.Environment.Interfaces, and OpenSim.Region.Interfaces
into OpenSim.Region.Framework.{Interfaces,Scenes} leaving only region
modules in OpenSim.Region.Environment.
The next step will be to move region modules up from
OpenSim.Region.Environment.Modules to OpenSim.Region.CoreModules and
then sort out which modules are really core modules and which should
move out to forge.
I've been very careful to NOT BREAK anything. i hope i've
succeeded. as this is the work of a whole week i hope i managed to
keep track with the applied patches of the last week --- could any of
you that did check in stuff have a look at whether it survived? thx!
|
|
sprouting another one
|