| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is for mantis 4783
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Didn't do what it said on the package!
This reverts commit 8643db3ef0c4dca709d85fc37240a18fd9049520.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
connector have decided that their vision of timeouts is the only valid one.
This uses reflection to show them the finger. Please test.
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 51d30fd34a950e0cd71d61ce0666a6d1e90bf233.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
* Added an error message in initial estate owner creation that makes it clear what needs to happen.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Deleted redundant migration for assets in SQLite
* Rewrote XInventory migrations in SQLite in the new style
|
|
|
|
| |
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OpenSim.Data.Null.UserAuthenticationData plugin
additional tweaks to get this working properly
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
estate migrations, change Sandbox to sandbox in sqlite region migrations
re-enabling the sqlite data tests revealed these errors!
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this appears to be okay even though we reuse it between runs without deleting it first.
size of the database appears not to be changing though that could be deceptive
|
|
|
|
| |
This addresses mantis http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=4739
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Melanie <melanie@t-data.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
(forgot to change test descriptions, has no effect on running the tests)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The base test class now tries to connect to DB, ignores all tests in the
class if unable to.
Also m_log changed to instance field (which in this case shouldn't cause
any problems), to avoid having to define it separately in each derived
class. Here I touched things that I don't understand well (using log4net),
so please review this commit.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
There was a whole bunch of these SQL files, all empty and apparently
unused. Removing them is just a clean-up, if anybody has a reason for these
files to be there, feel free to revert.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
(some Estate SQL left behind in the Region migration)
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Again, the same thing about potentially having non-GUID CreatorID.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Besides, AssetData is slightly optimized to StoreAsset in one request
("IF EXISTS() UPDATE ... ELSE INSERT ...")
The main change in the MS SQL Inventory implem. is that it now return
empty list (or whatever) when called with UUID.Zero, which is consistent
with how the code for other DBs work.
I did no changes at all in XInventory, as there is no test set for them.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
ok, so the estate stores now want their own migration files, but as it
happened the SQL definition were inside the Region migrations.
It seems better/cleaner to keep each 'store' separately updatable.
WARNING: any editing in the middle of the migration scripts (as opposite
to just appending to them) has the potential of messing up updates of
existing databases. As far as I can see, this one is (probably) safe,
the worst that could happen is the EstateStore migration silently fail
if the estate the tables are already there.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The tests have been modified to work under NUnit 2.4.6
(the one currently used in the project).
They will also work with NUnit 2.5+ as is, but will look better
if you #define NUNIT25 for them.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
NOTE that this INI file is currently loaded as a embedded RESOURCE, which is weird and has a
disadvantage of having to rebuild the Tests whenever the conn strings are changed.
The only reason is that I couldn't figure out a reliable way to put this INI into the correct
dir at runtime. If somebody can do it, that would be cool.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
AssetTests: The name has changed to reflect the fact it is no longer a base class,
but the complete asset test for all supported databases.
The test can also check storing of CreatorID, but the feature is
disabled at this commit!
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The problem was that some tests relied on prior tests
to leave the DB in a particular state, but the test class
cleared the DB every time. The affected tests have been
merged into one to remove the dependencies.
tested on all 3 Dbs, all tests green.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
(added more functions for cleaning up DB from the
derived tests)
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixed unfinished SQL in FetchAssetMetadataSet, fixed SQL
in UpdateAsset (must not modify ID).
NOT tested! But apparently shouldn't work worse than the previous version,
esp. the FetchMetadata thing.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
These are some generic classes that simplify writing tests
for any of the data connectors and databases. Among other
things, configuring the connection strings is done once,
in a separate resource file.
Tests based on the new BasicDataServiceTest class require
NUnit 2.5 or better.
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
| |
files. Restored Presence table to its taboo-breaking form.
|
|
|
|
| |
was less efficient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contains a migration.
SQLite: May contain nuts.
The SQLite migration copies the entire asset table. Be prepared for quite a wait. Don't interrupt it. Back up your assets db.
BasicAssetTest checks CreatorID storage, new test for weird CreatorID
(now also checks that non-GUID or empty CreatorID gets stored correctly)
Signed-off-by: Melanie <melanie@t-data.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The asset type wasn't in the list of "DontScramble" fields,
so the test assets were stored with randomized type, which
caused exception on reading them.
Also the scrambler was moved from local var to the class level,
so it could be used in the new tests I've added (see the next commit).
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Throwing an Ex. with SQL command in the message looks weird,
this is a bit better, but I'm still not sure if that's the
proper way to handle. Also, there is a catch one level up,
so is this one necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change migration error reporting to not truncate the statement when
reporting. It's a bit messier than the old error reporting, but at least
one gets an idea of what could be wrong again. And things look a lot
neater now.
|