Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Fear the lockless LLUDP implementation! | John Hurliman | 2009-10-08 | 1 | -192/+60 |
* | Putting the lock back in TryGetValue. | Diva Canto | 2009-10-08 | 1 | -9/+9 |
* | One last attempt at tunning the locking/no locking behaviour. The previous on... | Diva Canto | 2009-10-07 | 1 | -10/+16 |
* | Another go at the deadlock: not locking TryGetValue, and just catch/ignore ex... | Diva Canto | 2009-10-07 | 1 | -15/+31 |
* | Changed the locking mechanism, because the existing one is causing deadlocks ... | Diva Canto | 2009-10-07 | 1 | -25/+100 |
* | * Continued work on the new LLUDP implementation. Appears to be functioning, ... | John Hurliman | 2009-10-06 | 1 | -0/+185 |