1 files changed, 155 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/libraries/sqlite/unix/sqlite-3.5.1/test/descidx3.test b/libraries/sqlite/unix/sqlite-3.5.1/test/descidx3.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..98b60e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libraries/sqlite/unix/sqlite-3.5.1/test/descidx3.test
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+# 2006 January 02
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+#    May you do good and not evil.
+#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#*************************************************************************
+# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
+# focus of this script is descending indices.
+#
+# $Id: descidx3.test,v 1.5 2006/07/11 14:17:52 drh Exp $
+#
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+
+ifcapable !bloblit {
+  finish_test
+  return
+}
+db eval {PRAGMA legacy_file_format=OFF}
+
+# This procedure sets the value of the file-format in file 'test.db'
+# to $newval. Also, the schema cookie is incremented.
+# 
+proc set_file_format {newval} {
+  set bt [btree_open test.db 10 0]
+  btree_begin_transaction $bt
+  set meta [btree_get_meta $bt]
+  lset meta 2 $newval                    ;# File format
+  lset meta 1 [expr [lindex $meta 1]+1]  ;# Schema cookie
+  eval "btree_update_meta $bt $meta"
+  btree_commit $bt
+  btree_close $bt
+}
+
+# This procedure returns the value of the file-format in file 'test.db'.
+# 
+proc get_file_format {{fname test.db}} {
+  set bt [btree_open $fname 10 0]
+  set meta [btree_get_meta $bt]
+  btree_close $bt
+  lindex $meta 2
+}
+
+# Verify that the file format starts as 4.
+#
+do_test descidx3-1.1 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t1(i INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,a,b,c,d);
+    CREATE INDEX t1i1 ON t1(a DESC, b ASC, c DESC);
+    CREATE INDEX t1i2 ON t1(b DESC, c ASC, d DESC);
+  }
+  get_file_format
+} {4}
+
+# Put some information in the table and verify that the descending
+# index actually works.
+#
+do_test descidx3-2.1 {
+  execsql {
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 2, 2, 2, 2);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 3, 3, 3, 3);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 2.5, 2.5, 2.5, 2.5);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5, -5, -5, -5, -5);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(6, 'six', 'six', 'six', 'six');
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(7, x'77', x'77', x'77', x'77');
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(8, 'eight', 'eight', 'eight', 'eight');
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(9, x'7979', x'7979', x'7979', x'7979');
+    SELECT count(*) FROM t1;
+  }
+} 9
+do_test descidx3-2.2 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT i FROM t1 ORDER BY a;
+  }
+} {1 5 2 4 3 8 6 7 9}
+do_test descidx3-2.3 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT i FROM t1 ORDER BY a DESC;
+  }
+} {9 7 6 8 3 4 2 5 1}
+
+# The "natural" order for the index is decreasing
+do_test descidx3-2.4 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE a<=x'7979';
+  }
+} {9 7 6 8 3 4 2 5}
+do_test descidx3-2.5 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE a>-99;
+  }
+} {9 7 6 8 3 4 2 5}
+
+# Even when all values of t1.a are the same, sorting by A returns
+# the rows in reverse order because this the natural order of the
+# index.
+#
+do_test descidx3-3.1 {
+  execsql {
+    UPDATE t1 SET a=1;
+    SELECT i FROM t1 ORDER BY a;
+  }
+} {9 7 6 8 3 4 2 5 1}
+do_test descidx3-3.2 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE a=1 AND b>0 AND b<'zzz'
+  }
+} {2 4 3 8 6}
+do_test descidx3-3.3 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE b>0 AND b<'zzz'
+  }
+} {6 8 3 4 2}
+do_test descidx3-3.4 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE a=1 AND b>-9999 AND b<x'ffffffff'
+  }
+} {5 2 4 3 8 6 7 9}
+do_test descidx3-3.5 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE b>-9999 AND b<x'ffffffff'
+  }
+} {9 7 6 8 3 4 2 5}
+
+ifcapable subquery {
+  # If the subquery capability is not compiled in to the binary, then
+  # the IN(...) operator is not available. Hence these tests cannot be 
+  # run.
+  do_test descidx3-4.1 {
+    execsql {
+      UPDATE t1 SET a=2 WHERE i<6;
+      SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE a IN (1,2) AND b>0 AND b<'zzz';
+    }
+  } {8 6 2 4 3}
+  do_test descidx3-4.2 {
+    execsql {
+      UPDATE t1 SET a=1;
+      SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE a IN (1,2) AND b>0 AND b<'zzz';
+    }
+  } {2 4 3 8 6}
+  do_test descidx3-4.3 {
+    execsql {
+      UPDATE t1 SET b=2;
+      SELECT i FROM t1 WHERE a IN (1,2) AND b>0 AND b<'zzz';
+    }
+  } {9 7 6 8 3 4 2 5 1}
+}
+
+finish_test